Cultivating Flora

Steps To Diagnose Fungal Diseases On New Hampshire Vegetable Plants

Diagnosing fungal diseases on vegetable plants in New Hampshire requires a systematic approach that combines careful observation, basic field tests, proper sample collection, and, when necessary, laboratory confirmation. Weather patterns in New Hampshire, with cool, wet springs and warm, humid summers in many locations, create favorable conditions for a range of true fungi and fungal-like pathogens. This article provides step-by-step guidance you can apply at the garden or farm scale, practical diagnostic tips, and management recommendations tied to specific diagnoses.

Understand the scope: fungi versus fungal-like pathogens

Not every disease that looks fungal is caused by a true fungus. Oomycetes (water molds) such as Phytophthora and Pythium, and other soil-borne organisms, cause similar symptoms but have different biology and control needs. For practical on-farm diagnosis, treat “fungal” and “fungal-like” diseases together until laboratory testing clarifies the pathogen, but remember that fungicide choices and cultural controls may differ by organism group.

Why the distinction matters

True fungi generally produce spores and mycelium and respond to a different set of fungicides than oomycetes. For example, metalaxyl-type products are active on many oomycetes but not on most true fungi. Cultural controls such as improving drainage are vital for oomycetes. Knowing whether a pathogen is a fungus or an oomycete informs effective treatment planning.

Step 1: Observe and document symptoms carefully

Good diagnosis starts with careful observation and record keeping. Before removing samples, record the disease pattern, timing, and environmental context.

Symptoms to document by plant part:

Take clear photographs showing whole plants, a close-up of symptomatic tissue, and the general field distribution. Note the date and time for each photo.

Step 2: Field diagnosis and simple tests

Field diagnosis can be surprisingly accurate with a few simple checks and minimal equipment.

When to suspect soil- or waterborne pathogens:

When to suspect airborne pathogens:

Step 3: Collecting and preparing samples for diagnosis

Correct sampling increases the chance of a definitive diagnosis from a diagnostic lab or extension service.

  1. Collect multiple samples representing the range of symptoms (early, mid, advanced) and from different affected areas.
  2. Include entire plants when possible for root and stem inspection; if not practical, include symptomatic leaves, stems, fruits, and a bit of adjacent soil.
  3. Place samples in clean paper bags or cardboard boxes. Avoid airtight plastic bags for warm, moist tissue because they promote decay and alter diagnostic signs.
  4. Keep samples cool and deliver to a diagnostic lab within 24 to 48 hours. Refrigerate if transport will be delayed but do not freeze.
  5. Label each sample with date, location in the field, crop, variety, and brief history of symptoms and management practices.

If submitting samples is not feasible, preserve representative photos and detailed notes to share with advisors.

Step 4: Laboratory and advanced diagnostics

When field tests are inconclusive or when control decisions hinge on a precise identity, use diagnostic labs for confirmation. Typical laboratory methods include:

When submitting samples, provide as much field information as possible and ask the lab to report on the organism group (fungus, oomycete, bacteria) and species-level identification where available. Ask whether the lab can test for fungicide resistance if that question is relevant to management decisions.

Step 5: Interpret results and determine management actions

Match diagnosis to management that is effective for that organism group and crop situation. Use an integrated approach combining cultural, biological, and, when necessary, chemical controls.
Cultural and physical controls to prioritize:

Chemical controls and important caveats:

Biological and cultural products:

Practical profiles: common New Hampshire vegetable fungal diseases and how to recognize them

Below are concise diagnostic clues and management takeaways for several diseases commonly encountered in New Hampshire vegetable production.
Powdery mildew (true fungi, many hosts)

Downy mildew (oomycete; hosts include cucurbits, lettuce)

Early blight (Alternaria solani; solanaceous crops like tomato)

Late blight (Phytophthora infestans; potato and tomato; an oomycete)

White mold / Sclerotinia stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum)

Fusarium and Verticillium wilts (soil-borne fungi)

Rusts (Puccinia spp. and others)

Record-keeping and follow-up monitoring

Keep a disease log each season documenting symptoms, weather conditions, management actions taken, and outcomes. This helps refine diagnosis over multiple seasons and improves timing of control measures. Re-inspect treated areas regularly, especially after weather events that favor disease, and be prepared to adjust tactics based on response and subsequent identification results.

Final practical takeaways

Diagnosing fungal diseases is a stepwise process that blends observation, practical field tests, and laboratory confirmation when necessary. In New Hampshire, the seasonal weather patterns make prompt and informed action essential to protecting vegetable crops. Applying these steps will improve diagnosis accuracy and result in more effective, sustainable disease management.